Yesterday was Good Friday. It is an ironic name for a day, given the event on this day that transpired almost two-thousand years ago for which we name it--the crucifixion and death of the Son of God for the sins of the world. It started the night before, with an arrest and unjust hearing for the purpose of condemning an innocent man. It continued on Friday with the formal trial before Pilate, a Roman flogging, and finally, the brutal crucifixion of Jesus Christ outside of Jerusalem. It ended with his death and burial in an unused tomb provided by Joseph of Arimathea.
The bad. The condemnation, punishment, and death of an innocent man. The violent hatred of men against him. The bloody torture and agony as the hours passed. The emotional pain and anguish of those who loved him and watched as he suffered. The separation from God as he bore the sins of the world. Death. Darkness. Earthquake. What is good about any of this?
What we see in Jesus Christ is the ultimate example in which God is able to take what is awful and bring good from it. We call it good Friday because the perfect Son of God, in taking the punishment that each of our sins demanded, has now made a way that we might share his righteousness. Because of his faithfulness, my faithlessness is covered. Because of his obedience, my rebellion is forgiven. Because of his death, I am given life.
You can think of the cross of Christ as the "black hole" for sin's penalty. As Jesus breathed his last, he had finally and fully drank every last molecule of the penalty for all sin, for all time, once for all. Everything had been pulled into him and been borne by him. There is no more condemnation because he has taken all of the condemnation on himself. We are freed from the certainty of facing our own eternal crucifixions because of his one crucifixion.
Good Friday is good because of what awaits us tomorrow. He does not remain in the grave. How could he? Those who condemned him--the religious leaders, soldiers, Pilate, and the people--their word was "crucify him." His word was, "It is finished." Tomorrow, we get to rejoice in overwhelming celebration at the final word: the word of the Father. The resurrection is the vindication of the Son by the Father. The Father stands up from His throne, declares for all of heaven and earth to see and hear, "You are my Son, today I have begotten you!"
Showing posts with label Sin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sin. Show all posts
Saturday, April 11, 2020
Saturday, May 11, 2019
Judgment in James 2
For judgment will be merciless to the one who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgment. (James 2:13)
Recently at church a question was posed about sharing the gospel and if, in light of this verse, one can judge another person's actions as sin (in terms of calling out certain activity as sin to the other person). I've thought some about this question and wanted to articulate a response, because I think there is some confusion over this verse and the idea of judgment in general. I will use the context of the passage in James 2:1-13 to highlight what James is referring to, and thus, what he is not.
For James, judgment, in this passage, is showing favoritism to certain people on the basis of certain characteristics. He opens the passage with an example contrasting showing favoritism to a rich man over a poor man, and how doing so makes one become a "judge with evil motives." (2:4) The initial point here is that showing favoritism towards people on the basis of wealth is wrong. He follows this example with a few of the ten commandments and demonstrates that showing favoritism makes one guilty of breaking all of the law (2:8-10). This is difficult to follow on the heels of his rich/poor man example. What is the connection? Why does James, who is speaking of not showing favoritism, then immediately follow it with commandments and the breaking of that law?
I think the argument that James is making is the following: just as we are not to show favoritism to people on the basis of wealth, so too we are not to show favoritism to people on the basis of sin, because our own sin condemns us -- the very act of showing favoritism is sin! One is not more valuable than another based on the sins in one's life, just like one is not more valuable than another on the basis of one's wealth. The Christian faith is one in which we are walk without playing the personal favoritism game (2:1).
Now we can see James' use of judgment differs with the idea of judging sin as sin. One who is a Christian is one who has surrendered to and agrees with God's judgments. When God states that a sin is a sin, that is His judgment. To observe that, in my life, or in the life of another, is not taking the place of God or going beyond what is appropriate. It is to call 'good' what God calls good and evil what God calls evil. We get into trouble when we start making value statements on other people based on sin (or any other thing, such as wealth). And that is what James is addressing here. There may be times where sin is to be labeled as such, in the hopes of repentance and/or restoration (recall that in James 5:15-16 we are told to confess our sins to one another to be healed). But, I go too far when I use sin, or anything else, to show favoritism to one over another.
Recently at church a question was posed about sharing the gospel and if, in light of this verse, one can judge another person's actions as sin (in terms of calling out certain activity as sin to the other person). I've thought some about this question and wanted to articulate a response, because I think there is some confusion over this verse and the idea of judgment in general. I will use the context of the passage in James 2:1-13 to highlight what James is referring to, and thus, what he is not.
For James, judgment, in this passage, is showing favoritism to certain people on the basis of certain characteristics. He opens the passage with an example contrasting showing favoritism to a rich man over a poor man, and how doing so makes one become a "judge with evil motives." (2:4) The initial point here is that showing favoritism towards people on the basis of wealth is wrong. He follows this example with a few of the ten commandments and demonstrates that showing favoritism makes one guilty of breaking all of the law (2:8-10). This is difficult to follow on the heels of his rich/poor man example. What is the connection? Why does James, who is speaking of not showing favoritism, then immediately follow it with commandments and the breaking of that law?
I think the argument that James is making is the following: just as we are not to show favoritism to people on the basis of wealth, so too we are not to show favoritism to people on the basis of sin, because our own sin condemns us -- the very act of showing favoritism is sin! One is not more valuable than another based on the sins in one's life, just like one is not more valuable than another on the basis of one's wealth. The Christian faith is one in which we are walk without playing the personal favoritism game (2:1).
Now we can see James' use of judgment differs with the idea of judging sin as sin. One who is a Christian is one who has surrendered to and agrees with God's judgments. When God states that a sin is a sin, that is His judgment. To observe that, in my life, or in the life of another, is not taking the place of God or going beyond what is appropriate. It is to call 'good' what God calls good and evil what God calls evil. We get into trouble when we start making value statements on other people based on sin (or any other thing, such as wealth). And that is what James is addressing here. There may be times where sin is to be labeled as such, in the hopes of repentance and/or restoration (recall that in James 5:15-16 we are told to confess our sins to one another to be healed). But, I go too far when I use sin, or anything else, to show favoritism to one over another.
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Why does God appear nasty?
I am taking another class at Dallas Theological Seminary, this one under Dr. Bingham, and am having my mind stretched and expanded in some interesting and challenging ways. The class this week is on the History of Doctrine, and a discussion today ensued on why the church ignores much of the Old Testament. A big part of the reason is because the church is uncomfortable with how God is portrayed in the Old Testament. He seems judgmental, angry, jealous, vindictive, loves war and killing, and appears downright nasty. How do I harmonize the Old Testament’s (and even some of the New) view of God with the picture that Christ gives me?
I posed the question to Dr. Bingham on how we respond to those such as Dawkins, who in his book, The God Delusion, called the God of the Old Testament many of those things mentioned above (and much more). Bingham’s response was at first surprising and then absolutely refreshing to me:
Justice, when executed by a Perfect Judge, is beautiful.
How in the world can I find those descriptions beautiful? One of Bingham’s favorites is Isaiah 63:3, which describes God as walking on and squashing, squeezing the blood out of, those who are wicked, staining his white garment with the blood and gore of those He has crushed. It hit me like a ton of bricks, or maybe like a man being squeezed just a bit :).
The “nastiness” of God simply shows me how serious He views sin. Read that again. That anger, that seeming ugliness, the death and blood and sacrifice required by God, is because of my sin. All of this is a vivid image, a stark reality of just how serious sin is to a holy God. It is ugly because sin is ugly. It is bloody because sin is bloody. It is horrible because sin is horrible. The consequences of sin are ugly, bloody, and horrific. The cross is ugly, it is bloody, it is horrific because of sin. “Without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness of sin.” (Heb. 9:22)
The God of the Old Testament is just as beautiful as the God of the New and He is one and the same. “How beautiful are the feet of them who bring good news”, the news that Jesus Christ, “who knew no sin, became sin”, took the trampling and anger and fury of God in my place, that “I might become his righteousness in Christ”, so that I might be in the palm of his hand and not under the heel of his foot (Is. 52:7, 2 Co. 5:21).
Monday, May 14, 2007
Relationship Threats
Relationship Threats
I don’t have a great amount of relationship experience, but these last few months have been a great eye-opener to me about many things involving relationships. It is one thing to read about them – it is quite another to actually live it! I have observed several things in myself that I want to share, specifically regarding what I consider some of the greatest threats (coming from the flesh) to a successful relationship. I believe these not only apply to relationships with the opposite sex, but also all types of friendships and family interactions.
Pride
This is one of the deadly sins, and one of those that God specifically says He hates (stated several times in Proverbs). From this sin comes judgmental behavior and thoughts (“I am better than you”), arrogance, distance, stubbornness, and even feeds selfishness. C.S. Lewis said that pride is essentially competitive in its nature, and how deep and intimate can any relationship be if one is constantly competing with the loved one? I had separated pride and stubbornness, but I personally think that the stubborn sin’s source is pride and selfishness.
Selfishness
This is an insidious enemy and one that in my opinion will kill love faster than most things. Men are commanded to love as Christ loved the church – sacrificial servant leadership. One simply cannot sacrifice and serve through being selfish. Selfishness is the opposite of sacrifice and service. How can I focus on meeting your needs and carefully listening to your desires, wants, hurts, frustrations, and joys if I am self-focused? Christ said to follow Him we must take up our cross daily and follow Him. He paints a picture of dying to self, daily, but even more of what I am finding to be true, hour by hour and minute by minute.
Fear
This is nasty sin, especially because it is so often is covered by lies and deceit. Perhaps “I don’t want to do that” – I claim to be selfish, when perhaps I am really afraid of doing it. Fear loves to hide. Fear will many times manifest itself through other emotions and frustrations. Men, this is especially true with anger. I have said before (and it is not me saying it, but well-documented and known psychology) that anger is not a primary emotion – that it reveals something deeper. Many times, anger is covering fear.
There are many other sins of the flesh that threaten relationships, but these three seem to be fairly significant, in at least my life. And I am learning that God is not interested in me being less selfish, but not being selfish at all. Yes, that is practically not possible, but that is the goal. He does not accept an excuse on my part such as, “Well, I’ve been pretty unselfish this last week, so I can be selfish today.” No, each day we must die to ourselves, and live to Him. I say must intentionally here – because if not, it only creates strain and hurt in our relationships and friendships.
I don’t have a great amount of relationship experience, but these last few months have been a great eye-opener to me about many things involving relationships. It is one thing to read about them – it is quite another to actually live it! I have observed several things in myself that I want to share, specifically regarding what I consider some of the greatest threats (coming from the flesh) to a successful relationship. I believe these not only apply to relationships with the opposite sex, but also all types of friendships and family interactions.
Pride
This is one of the deadly sins, and one of those that God specifically says He hates (stated several times in Proverbs). From this sin comes judgmental behavior and thoughts (“I am better than you”), arrogance, distance, stubbornness, and even feeds selfishness. C.S. Lewis said that pride is essentially competitive in its nature, and how deep and intimate can any relationship be if one is constantly competing with the loved one? I had separated pride and stubbornness, but I personally think that the stubborn sin’s source is pride and selfishness.
Selfishness
This is an insidious enemy and one that in my opinion will kill love faster than most things. Men are commanded to love as Christ loved the church – sacrificial servant leadership. One simply cannot sacrifice and serve through being selfish. Selfishness is the opposite of sacrifice and service. How can I focus on meeting your needs and carefully listening to your desires, wants, hurts, frustrations, and joys if I am self-focused? Christ said to follow Him we must take up our cross daily and follow Him. He paints a picture of dying to self, daily, but even more of what I am finding to be true, hour by hour and minute by minute.
Fear
This is nasty sin, especially because it is so often is covered by lies and deceit. Perhaps “I don’t want to do that” – I claim to be selfish, when perhaps I am really afraid of doing it. Fear loves to hide. Fear will many times manifest itself through other emotions and frustrations. Men, this is especially true with anger. I have said before (and it is not me saying it, but well-documented and known psychology) that anger is not a primary emotion – that it reveals something deeper. Many times, anger is covering fear.
There are many other sins of the flesh that threaten relationships, but these three seem to be fairly significant, in at least my life. And I am learning that God is not interested in me being less selfish, but not being selfish at all. Yes, that is practically not possible, but that is the goal. He does not accept an excuse on my part such as, “Well, I’ve been pretty unselfish this last week, so I can be selfish today.” No, each day we must die to ourselves, and live to Him. I say must intentionally here – because if not, it only creates strain and hurt in our relationships and friendships.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)